In Paul M. Dombrowski’s (2007) article, “The Evolving Face of Ethics in Technical and Professional Communication: Challenger to Columbia” he deliberated “not only with ethics with respect to technical, scientific, and professional communication, but also with a broader scope to include such areas as environmental ethics, feminist ethics, and cultural ethics” (p. 307). Dombrowski evaluated the historical progression of ethics, the broadening of ethics relating to pedagogy, the critical theory surrounding ethical writing, feminist and gender issues, the ethics within environmental and visual issues, the parallels and differences between the Challenger and Columbia reports, and the normalization of deviance. Dombrowski’s purpose was to demonstrate that “Part of being human is having a sense of responsibility for what we do” (p. 317). Dombrowski’s intended audience was technical writers of influential reports responsible for upholding ethical standards. Dombrowski skillfully set up the ethical background to support the comparison of the Challenger and the Columbia reports.