In Colton, Holmes, and Walwema’s (2017) article, “From NoobGuides to #OpKKK: Ethics of Anonymous’ Tactical Technical Communication” they analyzed “the ethical thought of feminist philosopher Adriana Cavarero, particularly her concept of vulnerability, as a supplement for those employing tactics for social justice causes” and examined “the technical documents produced by the hacktivist collective Anonymous” (p. 59). Colton, Holmes, and Walwema discussed the problematics of tactics being classified as “an art of the weak,” the suggested body of thought called the “ethics of care,” then examined three of Anonymous’ recent technical communication genres that demonstrated an ambiguous ethical status, ethical justification, discerning whether a tactic aims away or towards “horrorism,” the evaluation of ethics of tactics through vulnerability or unethical tactic, the act of utilizing hacking, and the issue of doxing hacked information with the question of accuracy and credibility. Colton, Holmes, and Walwema’s purpose was to illustrate that “Through the application of care ethics, particular Cavarero’s notion of vulnerability, we have worked to show that tactical technical communication can benefit from supplementation” (p. 73). Colton, Holmes, and Walwema’s intended audience was those deciding whether a tactic was ethical or not and providing them with a different lens to assess each occurrence individually. Colton, Holmes, and Walwema exposed the wide range of unethical tactics and offered suggestions on how to combat the inclusive labeling, which was supported by their incorporation of the three technical communication genres that demonstrated an ambiguous ethical status.